What should Fripp about negative comments at DGM?

[jtmack]

What should Fripp do about negative comments at DGM?
I did leave one option off "the who cares anyway?" option. I know it's control freakish!
But I figure it would have dominated the poll.

[Geno]

I did leave one option off "the who cares anyway?" option. ... it would have dominated the poll.

It certainly would have been my pick. It was a good idea to give the audients a virtual space to comment and chit-chat, but it's DGM's choice how to engage (or whether to do it at all). Maybe there's just a certain amount of trouble & expense involved in having an open guestbook and the label staff don't feel they're getting enough value in return to make it worthwhile.

[Krimzep]

So, in other words if the masses don't post enough of this they can go

[Indyrod]

mine is "Let the people see---- Allow visual post and emoticons!"

I believe in open everything, they should be open enough to take the good with the bad.

[jtmack]

I think the whole thing was Sid's attempt to control fan postings after visiting places like this. Poor Sid can't hack it so his fantasy to play god and control proved too much and now he is sick of it. Let the people see, why not give the people full creative freedom. Sid said there will be no emoticons on their site this one's for you Sid .
I agree with Geno who cares but what would that matter anyway?